CFA Level 2 · Domain 8 of 10

CFA Level 2 Domain 8: Derivatives

At Level 2 derivatives move into pricing and valuation. It covers the pricing and valuation of forward commitments, the valuation of options (contingent claims), and the binomial model and option strategies.

Exam format
5-10%
Official topic areas
3
Assessment estimate
~7
Suggested study time estimate
20–30 hrs

About 11 min read Reviewed October 2026

Overview

Derivatives is 5-10% of the CFA Level 2 exam and advances from Level 1's conceptual introduction into pricing and valuing derivatives. It has three areas. Pricing and valuation of forward commitments cover how forwards, futures and swaps are priced at inception (the no-arbitrage price) and valued during their life as market conditions change, including interest rate, currency and equity forwards and swaps. Valuation of contingent claims covers valuing options using no-arbitrage principles, the factors determining option value, and put-call parity. The binomial model and option strategies cover the one- and two-period binomial option pricing model (using risk-neutral probabilities) and the use of option strategies.

The exam rewards pricing a forward or swap, valuing it as conditions change, valuing an option with the binomial model, and applying put-call parity, all grounded in no-arbitrage. The material is calculation-oriented and tested in vignettes, building on the fixed-income term structure.

How it's tested

CFA Level 2 Derivatives questions give market data in a vignette and ask you to price a forward or swap, value it at a point in time, or value an option with the binomial model, so read the case, identify the model, and compute precisely.

  • Price the forward commitment

    A forward, future or swap situation is described, and you compute the no-arbitrage price at inception.

  • Value over its life

    An existing forward or swap is described, and you value it as conditions change.

  • Value the option

    An option situation is described, and you value it with the binomial model or apply put-call parity.

Reasoning it through

The exam gives the spot price, the risk-free rate and the time to expiration and asks for the no-arbitrage forward price. The forward price is set so no riskless profit is possible: the spot price compounded at the risk-free rate over the contract's life, adjusted for any carry. Computing the forward price this way, by no-arbitrage at inception, is the approach the exam expects.

Topic areas 3

Official topic areas from the CFA Institute outline, in outline order.

8.1 Pricing and valuation of forward commitmentsPricing and valuing forwards, futures and swaps.
What it means
This covers the no-arbitrage pricing of forward commitments at inception and their valuation during their life: the forward price (spot compounded at the risk-free rate, adjusted for carry), how a forward or futures contract gains or loses value as the underlying moves, and the pricing and valuation of swaps (such as interest rate swaps as a series of forward rates or as bonds).
What to understand
At inception, a forward's price is set by no-arbitrage so the contract has zero value; afterward, its value changes as the spot and rates move. A swap's fixed rate is set so the swap's initial value is zero, and it is valued over its life as rates change. Distinguishing the price (fixed at inception) from the value (changing) is the key concept, and the calculations are tested.
How it shows up
A forward, future or swap situation is described, and you must price it at inception or value it over its life.
Common confusion
Confusing the forward price (set at inception) with the forward value (changing), or mispricing a swap.
8.2 Valuation of contingent claims (options)Option value drivers and put-call parity.
What it means
This covers valuing options using no-arbitrage principles, the factors that determine option value (underlying price, strike, time to expiration, volatility, risk-free rate, and cash flows on the underlying), the bounds on option prices, and put-call parity, the no-arbitrage relationship linking a call, a put, the underlying and a risk-free bond.
What to understand
Option value depends on several factors, rising with volatility and (for calls) time. Put-call parity states that a call plus a risk-free bond equals a put plus the underlying (for European options with the same strike and maturity), so the four instruments are priced consistently. Knowing the value drivers and applying put-call parity to find a missing price is tested.
How it shows up
An option situation is described, and you must identify a value driver or apply put-call parity.
Common confusion
Misapplying put-call parity (which instruments are on which side), or misjudging a value driver's effect.
8.3 The binomial model and option strategiesBinomial option pricing and strategies.
What it means
This covers the binomial option pricing model: the one-period and two-period models, modeling the underlying's up and down moves, using risk-neutral probabilities to value the option as the discounted expected payoff, and the use of option strategies (combinations of options and the underlying).
What to understand
The binomial model values an option by building a tree of possible underlying prices, computing the option payoff at each final node, and discounting back using risk-neutral probabilities (not real probabilities) at the risk-free rate. This no-arbitrage approach extends to multiple periods. Option strategies combine positions for specific payoffs. Knowing how to build and solve a binomial tree is heavily tested.
How it shows up
An option-pricing situation is described, and you must value the option with the binomial model or analyze a strategy.
Common confusion
Using real instead of risk-neutral probabilities, or misbuilding the binomial tree.

High-yield concepts

The terms, rules and formulas this domain turns into questions most often.

  • Forward price vs. value

    Set at inception versus changing.

    Remember
    Price fixed, value moves.
    Tested as
    Forward questions.
    Trap
    Confusing the two.
  • No-arbitrage pricing

    Prices prevent riskless profit.

    Remember
    The basis of valuation.
    Tested as
    Pricing questions.
    Trap
    Ignoring arbitrage.
  • Forward price formula

    Spot compounded at risk-free rate.

    Remember
    Adjusted for carry.
    Tested as
    Forward questions.
    Trap
    Omitting carry.
  • Swap pricing

    Fixed rate for zero initial value.

    Remember
    Valued as rates change.
    Tested as
    Swap questions.
    Trap
    Mispricing the swap.
  • Option value drivers

    Price, strike, time, volatility, rate.

    Remember
    Volatility raises value.
    Tested as
    Option questions.
    Trap
    Ignoring a driver.
  • Put-call parity

    Call plus bond equals put plus underlying.

    Remember
    No-arbitrage link.
    Tested as
    Option questions.
    Trap
    Misarranging the instruments.
  • Binomial model

    Tree of up and down moves.

    Remember
    Discount risk-neutral payoffs.
    Tested as
    Option questions.
    Trap
    Misbuilding the tree.
  • Risk-neutral probabilities

    Used to value options.

    Remember
    Not real-world probabilities.
    Tested as
    Option questions.
    Trap
    Using real probabilities.
  • Discount at risk-free rate

    Binomial valuation uses the risk-free rate.

    Remember
    With risk-neutral probabilities.
    Tested as
    Option questions.
    Trap
    Using a risky rate.
  • Option strategies

    Combinations of options.

    Remember
    For specific payoffs.
    Tested as
    Strategy questions.
    Trap
    Misreading the payoff.
  • Zero value at inception

    A fair forward or swap.

    Remember
    Value starts at zero.
    Tested as
    Forward questions.
    Trap
    Expecting nonzero value.

Side by side

Concepts candidates mix up, compared on the point that decides the answer.

Forward price vs. forward value

ConceptMeaningKey differenceCommon trap
Forward price Set at inception by no-arbitrage Fixed for the contract Confusing with value
Forward value Changes as the spot and rates move Zero at inception Confusing with price

Real vs. risk-neutral probabilities

ConceptMeaningKey differenceCommon trap
Risk-neutral Used in option valuation Discount at the risk-free rate Using real probabilities
Real-world Actual probabilities Not used for no-arbitrage pricing Using them in the binomial model

Put-call parity components

ConceptMeaningKey differenceCommon trap
Call plus bond Fiduciary call Equals a protective put Misarranging
Put plus underlying Protective put Equals the fiduciary call Misarranging

Exam traps

Each trap is an answer that looks right. Learn the clue that should change your mind.

  1. Forward has value at inception

    What candidates pick
    Assume a newly initiated forward at the no-arbitrage price has positive value.
    Why it looks right
    It locks in a price.
    Why it's wrong
    A forward priced by no-arbitrage has zero value at inception; it gains or loses value only as the underlying and rates move afterward.

    Clue to watch for The forward was just initiated at the fair price.

  2. Real probabilities in the tree

    What candidates pick
    Value an option in the binomial model using the real-world probabilities of up and down moves.
    Why it looks right
    They seem relevant.
    Why it's wrong
    No-arbitrage option valuation uses risk-neutral probabilities and discounts at the risk-free rate, not real-world probabilities.

    Clue to watch for The binomial model is being used to value the option.

  3. Put-call parity misarranged

    What candidates pick
    Set a call plus the underlying equal to a put plus a bond.
    Why it looks right
    All four appear.
    Why it's wrong
    Put-call parity states a call plus a risk-free bond (present value of the strike) equals a put plus the underlying; the arrangement matters.

    Clue to watch for The question asks to solve for a missing option price.

  4. Ignore carry in the forward price

    What candidates pick
    Price a forward on a dividend-paying stock as just the spot compounded.
    Why it looks right
    Compounding is the base.
    Why it's wrong
    The forward price must adjust for carry (dividends or income on the underlying), which reduces the forward price.

    Clue to watch for The underlying pays dividends or income.

  5. Swap fixed rate is arbitrary

    What candidates pick
    Assume the swap's fixed rate can be set at any level.
    Why it looks right
    It is negotiated.
    Why it's wrong
    The swap's fixed rate is set by no-arbitrage so the swap has zero value at inception, based on the current term structure.

    Clue to watch for The swap is initiated at a fair rate.

Answer framework

For any Derivatives item set, use these steps to find the answer the exam expects.

  1. For forward commitments, compute the no-arbitrage price at inception (spot compounded at the risk-free rate, adjusted for carry), remembering the value is zero at inception.
  2. Value an existing forward or swap over its life as the spot and rates change.
  3. For options, apply the value drivers (volatility and time raise value) and put-call parity (call plus bond equals put plus underlying) to find a missing price.
  4. Value an option with the binomial model by building the tree, computing payoffs, and discounting with risk-neutral probabilities at the risk-free rate.
  5. Pull the right figures from the vignette and compute precisely, since no-arbitrage pricing is exact. Where two approaches seem to fit, choose the no-arbitrage method the question specifies.

Practice question

A forward contract on a non-dividend-paying stock is initiated today at its no-arbitrage forward price, which is the current spot price compounded at the risk-free rate over the contract's life. What is the value of this forward contract to the long party at the moment it is initiated?

Choose one answer

Want more like this? The CFA Level 2 practice test has questions for every domain.

Checklist

0 of 10

Tick each one you can do without notes. Your ticks stay in this browser.

Study strategy

Approach Level 2 Derivatives as precise, no-arbitrage pricing, where the vignette format rewards exact computation. Start with forward commitments: compute the no-arbitrage forward price (spot compounded at the risk-free rate, adjusted for carry), and firmly separate the price (set at inception, with zero value) from the value (changing over the contract's life). Learn swap pricing and valuation the same way.

Then master option valuation: the value drivers (volatility and time raise value), put-call parity (and its exact arrangement of call, put, underlying and bond), and especially the binomial model, building the tree and discounting with risk-neutral probabilities at the risk-free rate, never real-world probabilities.

Because the calculations are exact and tested in vignettes, drill binomial-tree and forward-valuation item sets, practicing careful input selection and computation. Because Level 2 is tested through vignettes, practice full item sets under timed conditions (about 12 minutes per set), pulling the right figure from the right exhibit, and review misses by checking both input selection and calculation. Afterwards, move to Alternative Investments.

FAQ

How much of CFA Level 2 is Derivatives?

Derivatives is 5-10% of the exam, a smaller weight, but its no-arbitrage pricing is exact and unforgiving in the vignette format, and it connects to fixed income and portfolio management.

What is the difference between the price and the value of a forward?

The forward price is set at inception by no-arbitrage so the contract has zero value to both parties. The forward value is the contract's worth during its life, which changes as the underlying's spot price and interest rates move away from the locked-in forward price.

Why does a fair forward have zero value at inception?

Because the forward price is set precisely so that no party can earn a riskless profit and no premium changes hands. With the price fair, the expected gains and losses offset, so the contract is worth zero to both parties at the moment it is initiated.

What is put-call parity?

A no-arbitrage relationship for European options stating that a call plus a risk-free bond (equal to the present value of the strike) equals a put plus the underlying asset, for the same strike and maturity. It lets you solve for a missing instrument's price from the other three.

How does the binomial model value an option?

It builds a tree of the underlying's possible up and down moves, computes the option's payoff at each final node, and discounts those payoffs back to the present using risk-neutral probabilities and the risk-free rate. This no-arbitrage approach extends to multiple periods.

Why use risk-neutral probabilities instead of real ones?

No-arbitrage option valuation discounts expected payoffs computed with risk-neutral probabilities at the risk-free rate, because this replicates the option's payoff with a portfolio of the underlying and the risk-free asset. Using real-world probabilities would require a risk-adjusted discount rate that is not needed in this framework.

How does Derivatives connect to the rest of the Level 2 exam?

Derivatives pricing relies on the term structure and interest rate models from fixed income, and derivatives are used to hedge and manage risk in portfolio management, while the no-arbitrage reasoning is a theme throughout valuation.

Other Finance certifications

Where the same subject shows up in other exams. Cards marked "Same subject" open the matching domain.

Test your Domain 8 knowledge

You have covered forward and swap pricing, option valuation and the binomial model. Test whether you can value derivatives under exam conditions.

Keep going