Home / artificial-intelligence-machine-learning / Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Fundamentals (AI-901) / Cheat Sheet
Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Fundamentals (AI-901)

AI-901 Cheat Sheet

AI-901 Tests Whether You Can Match AI Workloads to Foundry Tools and Use Them Responsibly

AI-901, which replaced the retired AI-900, rewards recognising the right AI workload, choosing and configuring a model, and building simple Foundry apps that follow responsible AI principles.

Check Your Readiness →
Among the harder certs
Avg: Not published by Microsoft
Pass: 750 / 1000
Most candidates understand Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Fundamentals (AI-901) concepts — and still fail. This exam tests how you apply knowledge under pressure.

AI-901 Decision Framework

The first three steps map to the AI concepts and capabilities domain (40-45%) and the last two to implementing AI solutions in Microsoft Foundry (55-60%). Most items describe a scenario and ask which workload, tool, setting or principle applies.

  1. 01
    Identify the Workload — Decide whether the scenario is generative chat, an agent, text analysis, speech, vision or information extraction.
  2. 02
    Choose the Model — Pick a model by capability (text, multimodal, image generation, speech) and a suitable deployment option in Microsoft Foundry.
  3. 03
    Configure — Write a clear system prompt, separate it from the user prompt, and set parameters such as temperature for the output you need.
  4. 04
    Build and Test — Deploy and test in the Foundry portal, then call the model or agent from a lightweight client with the Foundry SDK.
  5. 05
    Apply Responsible AI — Check the solution against fairness, reliability and safety, privacy and security, inclusiveness, transparency and accountability.

Wrong instinct vs correct approach

Biased loan recommendations
✕ Wrong instinct

Choose transparency because the bank should explain how the model reached its decision.

✓ Correct approach

Choose fairness. A model that treats similar applicants differently because of a demographic group is a fairness problem, even though transparency is also valuable.

Pulling fields from scanned invoices
✕ Wrong instinct

Send the invoice images to an image generation model or a plain chat prompt and copy the answer.

✓ Correct approach

Use Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools to extract structured fields from documents and forms. Information extraction is its own workload with a purpose-built tool.

FAQ bot gives different answers each time
✕ Wrong instinct

Raise the temperature so the model explores better answers.

✓ Correct approach

Lower the temperature and give a precise system prompt, ideally with the approved FAQ content as grounding. Consistency comes from lower randomness and clear instructions.

Know these cold

  • ▸ Six responsible AI principles — airness, reliability and safety, privacy and security, inclusiveness, transparency, accountability.
  • ▸ Low temperature for consistency; high temperature for creativity.
  • ▸ Rules and persona go in the system prompt.
  • ▸ Speech to text is recognition; text to speech is synthesis.
  • ▸ Forms, documents, audio and video fields mean Content Understanding.
  • ▸ Generative models can be wrong — round them and keep a human in the loop.
  • ▸ 700 on a scaled 1-1,000 is not the same as 70% correct.

Can you answer these without checking your notes?

In this scenario: "Biased loan recommendations" — what should you do first?
Choose fairness. A model that treats similar applicants differently because of a demographic group is a fairness problem, even though transparency is also valuable.
In this scenario: "Pulling fields from scanned invoices" — what should you do first?
Use Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools to extract structured fields from documents and forms. Information extraction is its own workload with a purpose-built tool.
In this scenario: "FAQ bot gives different answers each time" — what should you do first?
Lower the temperature and give a precise system prompt, ideally with the approved FAQ content as grounding. Consistency comes from lower randomness and clear instructions.

Common Exam Mistakes — What candidates get wrong

Mixing up transparency and accountability

Transparency means people can understand how an AI system works, what it is for and its limitations. Accountability means people and organisations remain responsible for the system's outcomes and its governance, so a question about who answers for a decision points to accountability.

Thinking temperature makes answers more accurate

Temperature controls randomness: lower values give more focused, repeatable output and higher values give more varied, creative output. It does not add knowledge, so it cannot by itself stop a model from producing incorrect content.

Putting rules in the wrong prompt

The system prompt (system message) sets the assistant's role, tone and constraints for the whole conversation, while the user prompt carries the specific request. Exam items often ask where to place an instruction such as "only answer questions about our products", and the answer is the system prompt.

Confusing entities with key phrases

Entity recognition identifies and categorises items such as people, places, organisations and dates, while key phrase extraction returns the main talking points of a text. Sentiment analysis and summarization are separate tasks again, so read what output the scenario wants.

Swapping speech recognition and synthesis

Speech recognition (speech to text) turns spoken audio into text, and speech synthesis (text to speech) turns text into spoken audio. A voice assistant uses both, but a captioning scenario needs only recognition.

Resources to help you pass Azure AI Fundamentals AI-901 on your first attempt

See whether Foundry hands-on tasks or AI concepts are holding back your AI-901 score.