Home / cybersecurity / Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect (SC-100) / Cheat Sheet
Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect (SC-100)

SC-100 Cheat Sheet

SC-100 Tests Which Framework or Product Boundary Solves the Requirement — Not Portal Clicks

SC-100 is the expert-level architect exam built on long case studies. Stop asking how to configure a feature and start asking which framework, product and priority satisfies every stated constraint at once.

Check Your Readiness →
Among the harder certs
Avg: Not published by Microsoft
Pass: 750 / 1000
Most candidates understand Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect (SC-100) concepts — and still fail. This exam tests how you apply knowledge under pressure.

SC-100 Domain Map (skills measured October 21, 2026)

Expect case studies describing tenants, hybrid AD, AWS or GCP accounts, OT plants and regulators. Several options are real Microsoft features; the right one meets every requirement with the least administrative effort. 700/1000 to pass; Microsoft does not publish the question count.

  1. 01
    Best practices and priorities (20–25%) — Zero Trust, MCRA vs. MCSB, CAF vs. WAF, landing zones, ransomware resiliency, secure AI adoption
  2. 02
    Security operations, identity and compliance (25–30%) — Defender XDR plus Sentinel, Entra Agent ID, Conditional Access, PIM, enterprise access model, Azure Policy vs. Compliance Manager
  3. 03
    Infrastructure (25–30%) — Defender CSPM tiers, Azure Arc vs. multicloud connectors, Exposure Management, Defender for IoT, Global Secure Access
  4. 04
    Applications and data (20–25%) — Copilot data security, Defender for Cloud Apps, managed identities and workload identity federation, key models, Defender for Storage and Databases

Wrong instinct vs correct approach

An attacker used a compromised Global Administrator to delete Azure Backup recovery points; leadership wants no repeat
✕ Wrong instinct

Switch the vault to geo-redundant storage

✓ Correct approach

Replication copies deletions too. Enable immutable vault with locked immutability, soft delete and multi-user authorization so one compromised admin cannot remove protection, and move privileged roles to PIM with just-in-time activation and approval.

A plant has hundreds of PLCs that cannot run agents and must never be actively scanned
✕ Wrong instinct

Deploy Defender for Endpoint to every controller

✓ Correct approach

Recommend Defender for IoT, which inventories OT devices, surfaces vulnerabilities and detects threats passively from mirrored network traffic. Endpoint agents and active scans can disrupt industrial controllers and are usually unsupported on them.

Remote staff need access to three internal apps under Zero Trust, replacing a full-tunnel VPN
✕ Wrong instinct

Upgrade the VPN gateways and add MFA at connection

✓ Correct approach

Use Microsoft Entra Private Access in Global Secure Access, which grants per-app access evaluated by Conditional Access without inbound firewall openings. A VPN still exposes whole network segments once a user connects.

Copilot is surfacing confidential HR pay spreadsheets to staff who should never have opened them
✕ Wrong instinct

Disable Microsoft 365 Copilot until further notice

✓ Correct approach

Copilot only returns what users can already access. Fix the cause with DSPM for AI to find oversharing, permission cleanup, sensitivity labels with encryption, and DLP; the files stay reachable through search even with Copilot off.

Policy says noncompliant storage accounts must not be deployed in any subscription
✕ Wrong instinct

Track them with Purview Compliance Manager improvement actions

✓ Correct approach

Compliance Manager measures posture; it does not enforce Azure settings. Assign an Azure Policy with the deny effect at a management group so it inherits down every landing zone subscription. Audit only reports and fails a prevent requirement.

Know these cold

  • ▸ Zero Trust test for every design — erify explicitly, least privilege, assume breach
  • ▸ MCRA = how products connect; MCSB = control baseline; CAF = estate; WAF = one workload
  • ▸ Ransomware priority — ecoverable immutable backups and privileged access before wider hardening
  • ▸ Azure Policy deny prevents; audit only reports; deployIfNotExists remediates
  • ▸ AWS and GCP accounts join through Defender for Cloud connectors; Azure Arc covers servers and clusters
  • ▸ PIM controls when privilege is active; entitlement management bundles access; access reviews recertify it
  • ▸ Defender for Cloud protects Azure workloads; Defender for Cloud Apps governs SaaS and shadow IT
  • ▸ Customer-managed keys only when key control or revocation is an explicit requirement
  • ▸ Enterprise access model — ontrol plane holds highest privilege and needs strongest protection
  • ▸ Secure Score measures recommendation adoption, never regulatory compliance evidence

Can you answer these without checking your notes?

In this scenario: "An attacker used a compromised Global Administrator to delete Azure Backup recovery points; leadership wants no repeat" — what should you do first?
Replication copies deletions too. Enable immutable vault with locked immutability, soft delete and multi-user authorization so one compromised admin cannot remove protection, and move privileged roles to PIM with just-in-time activation and approval.
In this scenario: "A plant has hundreds of PLCs that cannot run agents and must never be actively scanned" — what should you do first?
Recommend Defender for IoT, which inventories OT devices, surfaces vulnerabilities and detects threats passively from mirrored network traffic. Endpoint agents and active scans can disrupt industrial controllers and are usually unsupported on them.
In this scenario: "Remote staff need access to three internal apps under Zero Trust, replacing a full-tunnel VPN" — what should you do first?
Use Microsoft Entra Private Access in Global Secure Access, which grants per-app access evaluated by Conditional Access without inbound firewall openings. A VPN still exposes whole network segments once a user connects.

Common Exam Mistakes — What candidates get wrong

Hardening endpoints before securing recovery and privileged access in ransomware scenarios

Microsoft's ransomware guidance ranks recoverable backups and protected admin accounts first. Azure Backup needs immutable vaults, soft delete and multi-user authorization; geo-redundant storage alone replicates deletions. Pick endpoint tuning only after recovery cannot be destroyed.

Swapping MCRA, MCSB, CAF and the Well-Architected Framework

MCRA shows how capabilities connect; MCSB is the control baseline Defender for Cloud assesses by default; CAF and landing zones govern the whole estate; WAF reviews one workload. Words like assess, all subscriptions or single application point to different answers.

Recommending Sentinel as the only detection layer for Microsoft workloads

Defender XDR natively correlates Microsoft 365 and endpoint signals and performs automatic attack disruption. Add Sentinel for third-party firewalls, AWS CloudTrail, custom analytics, playbooks and low-cost long retention in the Sentinel data lake, all in the unified Defender portal.

Assuming free foundational CSPM includes attack path analysis

Attack path analysis, cloud security explorer and governance rules require the paid Defender CSPM plan. Foundational CSPM gives Secure Score and MCSB recommendations only. A requirement to prioritise risk by reachable critical assets also points to Microsoft Security Exposure Management.

Storing secrets more safely when the design could eliminate them

Moving a connection string into Key Vault is weaker than removing it. Managed identities authenticate Azure resources with no stored credential, and workload identity federation lets GitHub Actions or Kubernetes exchange tokens with Entra ID. AI agents should get Entra Agent ID identities, not app secrets.

Resources to help you pass Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect SC-100 on your first attempt

SC-100 rewards picking the right framework and product boundary. Test your architect-level calls now.